Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77453 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 29808 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2014 11:06:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Sep 2014 11:06:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:54743] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 58/D0-25114-8C200245 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:06:49 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8B38115404; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:06:45 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:06:44 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Peter Cowburn cc: Pierre Joye , Andrea Faulds , Laruence , PHP internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4D27A10E-6EC6-4806-94DB-1BF1B976CA7D@ajf.me> <600A7E27-7E6F-4ECF-805F-D62814AA3AB2@ajf.me> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1681708376-1411384005=:4267" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-1681708376-1411384005=:4267 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Peter Cowburn wrote: > On 22 September 2014 10:21, Pierre Joye wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Peter Cowburn > > wrote: > > > > > If you say so. Still, the asking of individuals to remove their=20 > > > votes so that the tally is in you favour is inexcusable. > > > > did I miss something? What is this "request to remove votes" thing? >=20 > Pierre, it didn=E2=80=99t take place on-list. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >=20 > In summary, Andrea asked individuals, myself included, several times=20 > to remove their =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D votes purely to cross the 2/3 majori= ty threshold. I would also like to point out that, just like a 8:8 vote is not a "50%=20 majority", 16:8 is technically also not a two thirds *majority*. The=20 RFC, like with many other important things is of course too vague on=20 this. cheers, Derick --8323329-1681708376-1411384005=:4267--