Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77445
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.217.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPg3Xx+Jsy6ms6Ypabg6fMd-DMEtR431cKofxTyqdqe8QKO6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B08F027B-EACA-42A1-BAFD-8B0FB3135016@ajf.me> <4D27A10E-6EC6-4806-94DB-1BF1B976CA7D@ajf.me>
 <CABBJUpf1jiZ9vs7MSvKXiC7J-=SD026YdW5XLHQ1vQ+nt6wpZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <F6E6CDD3-A81D-44ED-B607-CFB4A7C98211@ajf.me> <CABBJUpfW0+H_KstZ0j42YQTFCqZKf5OxyBnVY0-iRMUiC1sCng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU6fMgbDACUPy+LDqprBKE28qV2R1DfumyteaOTGe9hCBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABBJUpenAoQmDyvs5tNejnwH7raqHEm48jn8oXmokQMf7Yta9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU5b9Rr0D5=cvqQKZrvFtUddgjQNnFxhJ8a-ZRRNmm2_eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPg3XxKSxz1bgC+6dmOVFuJsfUHwg8khu7jq_WPxpshifMurWA@mail.gmail.com>
 <600A7E27-7E6F-4ECF-805F-D62814AA3AB2@ajf.me> <CAPg3XxJE7M5DC+rXoF7KobCeVp3_n0k4Kjpn=O0ipBfegim_8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEZPtU6wZFWkkheakY4FUr=gGi3Fwi5NReauPAoZoR3TDqBV5A@mail.gmail.com> <CAPg3Xx+Jsy6ms6Ypabg6fMd-DMEtR431cKofxTyqdqe8QKO6SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:46:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CABBJUpd6rR0xRUfO8LksNrS5WJEPVb1jc31gyECnt5A5mDPRCw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
Cc: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, 
	PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics
From: laruence@php.net (Xinchen Hui)

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> wro=
te:
>
>
> On 22 September 2014 10:21, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > If you say so. Still, the asking of individuals to remove their votes =
so
>> > that the tally is in you favour is inexcusable.
>>
>> did I miss something? What is this "request to remove votes" thing?
>
>
> Pierre, it didn=E2=80=99t take place on-list. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
>
> In summary, Andrea asked individuals, myself included, several times to
> remove their =E2=80=9Cno=E2=80=9D votes purely to cross the 2/3 majority =
threshold.  That,
> along with their timely concerns raised both on- and off-list about who c=
an
> vote, leads me to think=E2=80=A6 =E2=80=9Cshenanigans=E2=80=9D. [6]

ask people to vote yes,  close the vote immeditely once it reach the
2/3 requirement..

it's not cool,  and it's not about RFC process... it's about manner...

thanks
>
> What=E2=80=99s done is done, the RFC passed and was merged=E2=80=A6 let=
=E2=80=99s move along to
> getting stuff done.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pierre
>>
>> @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org
>
>
> [1] http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/11?m=3D18895597#18895597
> [2] http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/11?m=3D18948500#18948500
> [3] http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/11?m=3D18986456#18986456
> [4] http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/11?m=3D18986542#18986542
> [5] http://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/11?m=3D19003711#19003711
> [6] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/shenanigans



--=20
Xinchen Hui
@Laruence
http://www.laruence.com/