Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77407
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABBJUpenAoQmDyvs5tNejnwH7raqHEm48jn8oXmokQMf7Yta9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <B08F027B-EACA-42A1-BAFD-8B0FB3135016@ajf.me>
	<4D27A10E-6EC6-4806-94DB-1BF1B976CA7D@ajf.me>
	<CABBJUpf1jiZ9vs7MSvKXiC7J-=SD026YdW5XLHQ1vQ+nt6wpZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<F6E6CDD3-A81D-44ED-B607-CFB4A7C98211@ajf.me>
	<CABBJUpfW0+H_KstZ0j42YQTFCqZKf5OxyBnVY0-iRMUiC1sCng@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU6fMgbDACUPy+LDqprBKE28qV2R1DfumyteaOTGe9hCBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CABBJUpenAoQmDyvs5tNejnwH7raqHEm48jn8oXmokQMf7Yta9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:53:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5b9Rr0D5=cvqQKZrvFtUddgjQNnFxhJ8a-ZRRNmm2_eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laruence <laruence@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bfe9ea6e076a805038b4788
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--047d7bfe9ea6e076a805038b4788
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sep 21, 2014 10:48 AM, "Xinchen Hui" <laruence@php.net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Sep 21, 2014 10:08 AM, "Xinchen Hui" <laruence@php.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 21 Sep 2014, at 03:52, Xinchen Hui <laruence@php.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hey:
> >> >>
> >> >> it should be closed tomorrow, not today.
> >> >
> >> > It's the 21st in my timezone. I started the vote at 2am on the 14th
and
> >> > it's now 4am on the 21st. I don't see a problem.
> >>
> >> the problem is, you only get 16:8 on today.  and it's weekend.
> >>
> >> that means your RFC is not very common acceptable. (I have strong
> >> objection on it).
> >>
> >> and it's weekend,  so,  it's better to wait one day more..
> >>
> >> anyway, I see you already commit your patch... which is not very good.
> >>
> >
> > I did not manage to vote while being on the road. But I am +1. So
consider
> > it as, theoretically, 17:8.
> why you didn't?
>
> there are lot's of people didn't vote. so how to count theirs vote?
>
> (please if you have opinion.. then vote)

It is closed now.

> >
> > However the nitpicking about votes periods, % and co is getting
annoying. I
> > will see if we can clarify that. To use all possible ways to block or
push
> > RFCs is getting counter productive and produce a bad experience.
>
> and nervemind.   I respect the RFC process, even I don't like this RFC

:-)

> thanks
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Pierre
>
>
>
> --
> Xinchen Hui
> @Laruence
> http://www.laruence.com/

--047d7bfe9ea6e076a805038b4788--