Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77406 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 87414 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2014 03:49:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Sep 2014 03:49:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=laruence@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=xinchen.h@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: xinchen.h@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-la0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:50042] helo=mail-la0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 35/75-55126-BAA4E145 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 23:49:00 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id hz20so5140687lab.29 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rMeGAOvxlQVWOtYNAgzZf/wDGG/dMNAxbSeMCi7xMOs=; b=cWmKcYGA0Zg0r7aA/Ntkp0v2E4/s57953Ti9naj9uCzx+Qds9D3DoW9tZUtqk4rSoR Al6ad2aGUdgiYZAYjcIK868GbG2r5nnkAcgoj7L7aY6a8osl2pgej8WlUGM1bbjpxzQ8 ajLhExNYWIzg3L6nLSpAKtjxM+EXqkilY/MMsSEkh3XIPcK9vLX+kaE8GiHyD61qNZtN wsBPNQdb2XuS/3r6SJ4Kwkp+0GyXzsjhsOGYod8JfAynrIDckotQ8XtmD5j1MbowMQjI xfZBsgLdXnYvFQdr4qt1j33evcWaZrrnHZ3+mqYyw7iTv+txrzEwrDPpwVmn+2Y6zpMz zZmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn5C6GR43TIsACBMALd4pyNllqylTA51E617KN5T8f8Ko1eyKhc6YzmIDmoJzsntinCPMuP4IBvNl3CVwEWfeTOEfUAOBxAULrxkSK6OpXQyyK12RNT9IRu0jOqAjWieo8DzG5zO4stm9937tbPSiG1RvJhpg== X-Received: by 10.112.13.232 with SMTP id k8mr15478752lbc.81.1411271336385; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l13sm2252104lbh.32.2014.09.20.20.48.55 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n15so5129633lbi.34 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.112.171.202 with SMTP id aw10mr15728347lbc.52.1411271334423; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.187.234 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 20:48:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4D27A10E-6EC6-4806-94DB-1BF1B976CA7D@ajf.me> Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:48:34 +0800 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Andrea Faulds , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Integer Semantics From: laruence@php.net (Xinchen Hui) On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:33 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi, > On Sep 21, 2014 10:08 AM, "Xinchen Hui" wrote: >> >> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> > >> >> On 21 Sep 2014, at 03:52, Xinchen Hui wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey: >> >> >> >> it should be closed tomorrow, not today. >> > >> > It's the 21st in my timezone. I started the vote at 2am on the 14th and >> > it's now 4am on the 21st. I don't see a problem. >> >> the problem is, you only get 16:8 on today. and it's weekend. >> >> that means your RFC is not very common acceptable. (I have strong >> objection on it). >> >> and it's weekend, so, it's better to wait one day more.. >> >> anyway, I see you already commit your patch... which is not very good. >> > > I did not manage to vote while being on the road. But I am +1. So consider > it as, theoretically, 17:8. why you didn't? there are lot's of people didn't vote. so how to count theirs vote? (please if you have opinion.. then vote) > > However the nitpicking about votes periods, % and co is getting annoying. I > will see if we can clarify that. To use all possible ways to block or push > RFCs is getting counter productive and produce a bad experience. and nervemind. I respect the RFC process, even I don't like this RFC thanks > > Cheers, > Pierre -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/