Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77378 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11522 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2014 12:54:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Sep 2014 12:54:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.45 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.45 mail-qg0-f45.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.45] ([209.85.192.45:55220] helo=mail-qg0-f45.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/F2-24334-FF87D145 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:54:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id q108so1073357qgd.4 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 05:54:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mScdHUegd3V+2Dx1hbqml7gWBl8lcZOwjWtSJfRwKOQ=; b=uUZdVJQ1UWk6AYWLAC74GLtcai8uV9x7O1SNC8IecfFTk/y3H9aSgSVvrlJCCOykgS 2jMaNvkXyICFsGhT6gkheBG26APebEtJX+PALpPq3N3CZsd5y0B48/D0c7i0y21sgAw2 6VA0xqo2Oq5EstMjK0ZcJsbnHdz+dPdk28Vc2Tm5pW+eTvH/VJV7qMTt3KpUKNkXHwvV 41xednz919KghWjogHcT0Z1W3czWRi/IfzpWBTVzH0A2+ojHOo8mIl3pm+6QjZwP35v2 kPP30BSI9QOjiVS6bYFS48AmCsF9a1eMkG3MA1uzPZvo7jYSZoCQQ6pdW5AFnErdK16o DNDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.101.118 with SMTP id t109mr1550554qge.101.1411217660005; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 05:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.91.14 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 05:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.91.14 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 05:54:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> <0C090E94-E6C7-464D-8A83-A413FF6B109A@ajf.me> Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 14:54:19 +0200 Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP Internals , Andrew Faulds Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c16afc53534905037eb779 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs) --001a11c16afc53534905037eb779 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2014.09.20. 14:14 ezt =C3=ADrta ("Pierre Joye" ): > > On Sep 20, 2014 7:07 PM, "Andrea Faulds" wrote: > > > > > > > On 20 Sep 2014, at 06:06, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > > > I am not sure what brings you here but the idea of community votes wa= s > one > > > of the top thing when we introduced the voting RFC. > > > > I should've made clear I'm not opposed to community reps voting either. > People who have made enough contributions to earn either karma or community > rep status should be allowed to vote. My problem is people with neither. > > For example? I personally have seen a couple of cases where we (mostly Rasmus) approves outstanding php.net accounts but there are no follow up, so for example the proposed pecl package is not created nor any karma is granted. For the record: currently it is possible for a pecl ext developer to not have php.net account (pecl.php.net has its own user db and some exts aren't hosted on our svn/git infrastructure) which means that they won't have voting karma by default. I think it would make sense to review and cross-check the accounts and maybe remove those which were never used. We also have to keep in mind, that there could be users without any karma, but other contributions like sorting out bugs or event/notes moderation, etc. Afair the voting rfc required previous contribution not just an existing php.net account, but as I mentioned there are a bunch of ways to contribute other than having commits in one of the repos so there is no easy way to check that programatically. Ps: sorry for the typos, sending from my phone. --001a11c16afc53534905037eb779--