Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77376 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6945 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2014 12:07:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Sep 2014 12:07:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:45354] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F6/32-24334-71E6D145 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:07:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BC9B0008A; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:07:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Wir-yYxIpUvj; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:07:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [137.50.30.19] (oa-res-30-19.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.30.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38530B0008E; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 08:07:45 -0400 (EDT) References: <8DEFB90E-0F7F-4876-890D-D4AD1C655D87@ajf.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <0C090E94-E6C7-464D-8A83-A413FF6B109A@ajf.me> Cc: PHP internals X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12A365) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:07:43 +0100 To: Pierre Joye Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Is it fair that people with no karma can vote on RFCs? From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) > On 20 Sep 2014, at 06:06, Pierre Joye wrote: >=20 > I am not sure what brings you here but the idea of community votes was one= > of the top thing when we introduced the voting RFC. I should've made clear I'm not opposed to community reps voting either. Peop= le who have made enough contributions to earn either karma or community rep s= tatus should be allowed to vote. My problem is people with neither. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/=