Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77368
Return-Path: <mike.php.net@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 79841 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2014 05:50:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 20 Sep 2014 05:50:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mike.php.net@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mike.php.net@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.217.175 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.217.175 mail-lb0-f175.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.217.175] ([209.85.217.175:61905] helo=mail-lb0-f175.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 06/CA-13213-0A51D145 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 20 Sep 2014 01:50:25 -0400
Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n15so4323745lbi.34
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=0fd8QJDSMQWORH3b3/4wPcxb/nWSg9TDNKr5XEca2Lc=;
        b=GOBzSlP3WbGxVzeFfOqlTfykfij/ecK37p0XVjFn/cPToWuv/QzLPMt/NNXGB/QJDy
         k3mTvvdFffR9cdJsZT3p15t6MqT2NxE/hLGhWXcSEPXvw65NQrNCCjBB+MAFxxTEZE5w
         qC2pQrBIW4WxKGqiGgcpFQU8JlIHeT3iNHx82frdfohpDqdyJjwgwWBcnAIrNZESpUgu
         lvxw1XIshd3QPV0pa1fmcmYo+odNvNTrqrTieQeTdpwm8+8lEquogtlDfmTDrz30lhnd
         dL1s5E8VXyAiBkHG8cKmLe31XRSZgUhRk/emCvR/uwVeaRiHbtLU7lt0NcDAxwQrv5xx
         LN3Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.138.8 with SMTP id qm8mr10597883lbb.37.1411192221555;
 Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mike.php.net@gmail.com
Received: by 10.114.48.66 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.48.66 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Sep 2014 22:50:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKOpQSyiCDEUDGhn50RuLL7ox_TJCCjD=4=qZ68OqbA5krXWkA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKOpQSyiCDEUDGhn50RuLL7ox_TJCCjD=4=qZ68OqbA5krXWkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:50:21 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: GgnW6XBX8gdi5pMrQx1SGrZt0YU
Message-ID: <CALJZF3gfieLXf=veDJxGmRZuGWPTYbW3UL696W2ZSH+u3qsS2Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115e9c6136495050378cb1f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Change checkdnsrr() $type argument behavior
From: mike@php.net (Michael Wallner)

--089e0115e9c6136495050378cb1f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 20 Sep 2014 04:15, "Kris Craig" <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote:
>

>
> From what I can tell, there are valid arguments to be made for both, so I
> would love to see some discussion/debate here regarding which solution
> should be implemented, as I'm currently undecided.  Also please feel free
> to point out any areas of improvement for the RFC itself.
>

Functions don't throw E_ERROR on missing argument.

And ANY is about as bad as MX.

--089e0115e9c6136495050378cb1f--