Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77192 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37255 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2014 17:32:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Sep 2014 17:32:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 198.187.29.245 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 198.187.29.245 imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [198.187.29.245] ([198.187.29.245:57138] helo=imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 70/CC-53483-D11D5145 for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:32:13 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0048800DB; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:32:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NqOsqbnGRIXb; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:32:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from oa-res-27-90.wireless.abdn.ac.uk (oa-res-27-90.wireless.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.27.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FB778800E7; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 13:32:08 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: <5415D074.3020907@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 18:32:06 +0100 Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <6893A97A-EC4C-4124-B804-96E2A26B953F@ajf.me> <20140914000718.GB14312@phcomp.co.uk> <3177B936-50C1-4E5D-8687-FD235C72B411@ajf.me> <54153692.7050500@sugarcrm.com> <9CE963B0-E624-4267-BC2A-0F8D1F985DAE@ajf.me> <5415D074.3020907@sugarcrm.com> To: Stas Malyshev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Scalar Type Hinting with Cast From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 14 Sep 2014, at 18:29, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! >=20 >> The vote would be for the RFC as it is. Possible changes are things >> in the RFC I was uncertain on. I might hold votes on some of them, >> actually. >=20 > I'm sorry, but this makes little sense to me. There are a number of > mutually contradictory options here, how you can vote for them "as it > is=94? The =93possible changes=94 section only details possible *changes*, that = is, changes to the RFC that could be made, but have not been. So you = would be voting for the RFC without any of those changes. If those = changes were made, they would cease to be possible changes. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/