Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77008
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a569e18102821ff23dffde048c7207bb.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
References: <2afc5a878ff4c780c74f4604f77525c1.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<CABBJUpfeD3T1s5BpUvL-svtKXYxmHRbutzdagm+p8SOjuNnr_Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<fd7539872e45363348ae3c12890080eb.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<CAEZPtU5x=b=OoWQZh_SSTj_PaF1ePRpra8FnFfEUWQaiMsbGyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3bc533250c01664354fce3e4167ca78b.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
	<a569e18102821ff23dffde048c7207bb.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 18:17:44 +0400
Message-ID: <CA+9eiLvHh2=S0vKBJLJo+NW74dPdm-DXONAPeMS83t7qEsnDDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net>
Cc: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, Xinchen Hui <laruence@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52d5719a07255050201aabb
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 64 bit string offsets
From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov)

--bcaec52d5719a07255050201aabb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Anatol,

what do you mean? heap allocated structure?
I think, it's not a good option :(

I didn't have time to think about this yet.

Thanks. Dmitry.


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Anatol Belski <anatol.php@belski.net> wrote:

> On Sun, August 31, 2014 22:31, Anatol Belski wrote:
> > Hi Pierre,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, August 31, 2014 14:12, Pierre Joye wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Anatol,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For what I see it should have no impact, either mem usage or perf but
> >> when such offset is used, in 64bit.
> >>
> >> However some numbers are better, could you provide some using
> >> exclusively this syntax and using common apps pls? Only to be sure.
> >>
> > while testing drupal and wp, i see a regression of .3% on mem usage and
> > .1% on perf. When using the exclusive syntax, i see a perf difference
> > almost in ms range, so even not worth to mention. The functional part
> shows
> > no diff so far.
> >
> Laruence on the IRC suggested to implement this as a new zval type, so I'm
> going to try it out yet as that's a cleaner way do go.
>
> Regards
>
> Anatol
>
>

--bcaec52d5719a07255050201aabb--