Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77006 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78254 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2014 13:37:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2014 13:37:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:56473] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1F/43-48532-49674045 for ; Mon, 01 Sep 2014 09:37:26 -0400 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 3DAB06D209C; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:37:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 79.197.69.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:37:21 +0200 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3bc533250c01664354fce3e4167ca78b.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> References: <2afc5a878ff4c780c74f4604f77525c1.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> <3bc533250c01664354fce3e4167ca78b.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:37:21 +0200 To: "Anatol Belski" Cc: "Pierre Joye" , "Anatol Belski" , "Dmitry Stogov" , "PHP internals" , "Nikita Popov" , "Xinchen Hui" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 64 bit string offsets From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") On Sun, August 31, 2014 22:31, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > > On Sun, August 31, 2014 14:12, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> Hi Anatol, >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> >> >> For what I see it should have no impact, either mem usage or perf but >> when such offset is used, in 64bit. >> >> However some numbers are better, could you provide some using >> exclusively this syntax and using common apps pls? Only to be sure. >> > while testing drupal and wp, i see a regression of .3% on mem usage and > .1% on perf. When using the exclusive syntax, i see a perf difference > almost in ms range, so even not worth to mention. The functional part shows > no diff so far. > Laruence on the IRC suggested to implement this as a new zval type, so I'm going to try it out yet as that's a cleaner way do go. Regards Anatol