Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:77000 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35836 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2014 20:31:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Aug 2014 20:31:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=anatol.php@belski.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=anatol.php@belski.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain belski.net from 85.214.73.107 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: anatol.php@belski.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.73.107 klapt.com Received: from [85.214.73.107] ([85.214.73.107:54594] helo=h1123647.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 9B/10-33937-F0683045 for ; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 16:31:11 -0400 Received: by h1123647.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix, from userid 33) id 522D36D209C; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:31:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 93.205.113.119 (SquirrelMail authenticated user anatol@belski.net) by webmail.klapt.com with HTTP; Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:31:07 +0200 Message-ID: <3bc533250c01664354fce3e4167ca78b.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> In-Reply-To: References: <2afc5a878ff4c780c74f4604f77525c1.squirrel@webmail.klapt.com> Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2014 22:31:07 +0200 To: "Pierre Joye" Cc: "Anatol Belski" , "Dmitry Stogov" , "PHP internals" , "Nikita Popov" , "Xinchen Hui" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: 64 bit string offsets From: anatol.php@belski.net ("Anatol Belski") Hi Pierre, On Sun, August 31, 2014 14:12, Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi Anatol, > > > Thanks! > > > For what I see it should have no impact, either mem usage or perf but > when such offset is used, in 64bit. > > However some numbers are better, could you provide some using exclusively > this syntax and using common apps pls? Only to be sure. > while testing drupal and wp, i see a regression of .3% on mem usage and .1% on perf. When using the exclusive syntax, i see a perf difference almost in ms range, so even not worth to mention. The functional part shows no diff so far. Regards Anatol