Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76821 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17175 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2014 17:12:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2014 17:12:47 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 213.127.161.131 ip-213-127-161-131.ip.prioritytelecom.net Received: from [213.127.161.131] ([213.127.161.131:20052] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1F/01-10436-E0A77F35 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:12:46 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:11:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 213.127.161.131 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC From: phpdev@ehrhardt.nl (Jan Ehrhardt) Ferenc Kovacs in php.internals (Fri, 22 Aug 2014 18:59:01 +0200): >People means ext devs here. OK. >The concern raised here that if we delay the namechange then early >adopters(ext developers adding support for php7) have to update their code >twice. Provided the name change (back!) is agreed upon. Now that is has been changed once, there is a chance to look at it with an open mind and decide what is best for the coming years. Jan