Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76810 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 88966 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2014 12:39:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2014 12:39:30 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.223.116.227 227-116.citynet.ftth.internl.net Received: from [85.223.116.227] ([85.223.116.227:29452] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/12-13566-00A37F35 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:39:29 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:39:20 +0200 Message-ID: <79eev99gehln3nseujj62hte6gs59up4ct@4ax.com> References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 85.223.116.227 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC From: phpdev@ehrhardt.nl (Jan Ehrhardt) Pierre Joye in php.internals (Fri, 22 Aug 2014 14:17:04 +0200): >And I'd to remember that we suffer from double standards while you >guys do whatever you want with ng, and certainly with ast as well. Just a side note: talking in "you guys" and "we" is not constructive. I had the idea you had come a lot closer while working on the 64bit patch. Do not spoil that. Jan