Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76799 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64980 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2014 11:28:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2014 11:28:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=bobwei9@hotmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=bobwei9@hotmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain hotmail.com designates 65.55.111.90 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: bobwei9@hotmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 65.55.111.90 blu004-omc2s15.hotmail.com Received: from [65.55.111.90] ([65.55.111.90:63101] helo=BLU004-OMC2S15.hotmail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C0/1B-09530-E6927F35 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:28:46 -0400 Received: from BLU437-SMTP46 ([65.55.111.73]) by BLU004-OMC2S15.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:28:43 -0700 X-TMN: [23LG9HdRvel/o5x3Kzov0SNOOF515yFv] X-Originating-Email: [bobwei9@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from bobweinandsimac.fritz.box ([78.141.130.2]) by BLU437-SMTP46.smtp.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.0.9200.16384); Fri, 22 Aug 2014 04:28:41 -0700 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5F7502C7-BA91-42FB-9FDB-B109F0DE30B7" MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 13:28:37 +0200 CC: PHP internals References: To: Nikita Popov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2014 11:28:41.0505 (UTC) FILETIME=[39BBC910:01CFBDFC] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Better type names for int64 RFC From: bobwei9@hotmail.com (Bob Weinand) --Apple-Mail=_5F7502C7-BA91-42FB-9FDB-B109F0DE30B7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am 22.8.2014 um 13:16 schrieb Nikita Popov : > Hi internals! >=20 > Today the int64 RFC has been merged, despite objections regarding the > naming changes it introduces. >=20 > As we were not given a chance to resolve this issue before the merge, = a > short proposal has been created, which aims to revert all unnecessary > naming changes and instead use type names that are consistent with the > existing code base and expectations: >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/better_type_names_for_int64 >=20 > Due to the unexpected merge on short notice, with no chance for = discussion, > this issue is blocking a number of other patches. As such I ask if we = can > move through this RFC with a shortened cycle. I would not appreciate = having > to wait three weeks to have a workable codebase again. >=20 > Nikita Yes, please. We're all in favor of the 64 bit implementation, but = definitely not on the naming. I think it was a big mistake to not separate the naming and implementation votes initially. I also would support a shorter RFC cycle, due to its blocking nature. [Vote in 2-3 days, vote lasting one week as usual] Bob= --Apple-Mail=_5F7502C7-BA91-42FB-9FDB-B109F0DE30B7--