Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76763
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <72F89D3F-3DF8-41B1-81A7-24A1DD0F979D@ajf.me>
References: <CA+9eiLt7-a9vA-s2b7KymFLkGvFEW5rXJV5n3pMmkS+xxU6-qQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<6E03BE65-260C-4B94-9587-C785FBC112C2@ajf.me>
	<CAEZPtU6ADFRd4JekU_PuCNWAZHN3y28tNR-9XUmJ+qnGOn8T7Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<75F705FC-178D-4CA4-A2ED-4FAD81A22F23@ajf.me>
	<CAEZPtU4WKCqvFG-xHXZwBN+A2fLOtkH2g81uUL6k95wWhnf39A@mail.gmail.com>
	<72F89D3F-3DF8-41B1-81A7-24A1DD0F979D@ajf.me>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:08:31 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7AiKr2tEehp9hQ4SNNmAd+Fr9hfFDsAEwEucg_6hCOjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Cc: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Anatol Belski <ab@php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf15e44b920c30501279b91
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 64-bit integers and 64-bit string length patch is ready
 to be merged
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--047d7bf15e44b920c30501279b91
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Aug 21, 2014 8:05 PM, "Andrea Faulds" <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
>
>
> On 21 Aug 2014, at 19:03, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Now to be honest I would merge it right away. I do not see why we need
to discuss that again. When I see how phpng got accepted without a word,
time to stop arguing about such things. Merge and move back to code. If one
thinks that one thing or another should be changed, in this patch or phpng,
he will need to write a rfc (and not in 6 months :).
>
> This is a trivial name change. We have only once chance to get it right
since the IS_* constants are used so, so widely. We should get it right now=
.

Then please do a rfc, but we are not going to rewamp the patch for the 6th
time. It has been accepted and we have been more than cooperative.

> > > Forgive me if I=E2=80=99m wrong, but wouldn=E2=80=99t changing the na=
me again just be
a simple matter of global find/replace?
> >
> > No, totally not :)
>
> Why wouldn=E2=80=99t it? Could you elaborate?

I would instead to ask you to try to migrate a not so trivial extension :)

--047d7bf15e44b920c30501279b91--