Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76760 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86023 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2014 17:58:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2014 17:58:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.216 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.216 imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.216] ([192.64.116.216:33077] helo=imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D8/60-18459-06336F35 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:58:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3A332400D1; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:58:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id GLq4OqmyFea8; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (05439dda.skybroadband.com [5.67.157.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3311D2400C7; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 13:58:50 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:58:48 +0100 Cc: PHP internals , Dmitry Stogov , Anatol Belski Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <75F705FC-178D-4CA4-A2ED-4FAD81A22F23@ajf.me> References: <6E03BE65-260C-4B94-9587-C785FBC112C2@ajf.me> To: Pierre Joye X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 64-bit integers and 64-bit string length patch is ready to be merged From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 21 Aug 2014, at 18:56, Pierre Joye wrote: > The original patch used the right naming based on the type used behind = it. So IS_LONGLONG, then? > In any case, the patch represents what the rfc and the discussions = around > it say. I rather merge it asal and begin on the (long) list of todos = for 7. >=20 > If you like to propose new naming with the bigint rfc, please go = ahead. > Time is also an issue as ppl are beginning to migrate their extensions = to > test. Changing them again takes time. Forgive me if I=92m wrong, but wouldn=92t changing the name again just = be a simple matter of global find/replace? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/