Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76744 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 514 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2014 20:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Aug 2014 20:51:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 108.166.43.99 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 108.166.43.99 smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [108.166.43.99] ([108.166.43.99:45856] helo=smtp99.ord1c.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 14/6F-29327-43A05F35 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:51:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 79CA71805C8; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:50:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp5.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 13C061806DF; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:50:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender-Id: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com Received: from Stass-MacBook-Pro.local ([UNAVAILABLE]. [74.85.23.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.2.10); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 20:50:57 GMT Message-ID: <53F50A2F.3090603@sugarcrm.com> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:50:55 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dmitry Stogov , Nikita Popov , PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ext/standard/tests/http/bug60570.phpt failure From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > array of registered resources of particular type. See patch: > > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/f96c04f5979e726909ab It would be better as a pull, it's be easier to comment on it. For the function get_resources, the proto says it has no arguments, but it actually has one S argument that is not documented. Could you add a proto for it? > I'm not sure if such small change needs RFC. I don't think so, seems to be pretty non-controversial. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/