Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76703
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALJZF3jajjfxhVgRcc8LDtJAkZ3--Rkp=q7EamXxXOav3Dd6eA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53F3018E.6090201@php.net>
	<2d56v912urnaoilcckvkvhu1th6k4ntt1c@4ax.com>
	<CAEZPtU4bijwCYpih+vMYimXb4zJM1W0K5pvmdr+a4zZgUo2zDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALJZF3jajjfxhVgRcc8LDtJAkZ3--Rkp=q7EamXxXOav3Dd6eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:29:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU7YU3_nAkyiYRYeTF31-noHHb0s4JfNGFcnmJQxqLSjqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Wallner <mike@php.net>
Cc: Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] pecl_http
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
> On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <phpdev@ehrhardt.nl> wrote:
>> > Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should
>> > be in core as well.
>> >
>>
>> I never really understood why they are needed or why they have been
>> splitted off. I can imagine that other exts may need a similar thing
>> but...
>
>
> To be reusable. pecl/raphf is also used by pecl/pq; peck/propro has not had
> another use case yet, though.

propo could be a spl thing, if usefull for other.

As of raphf, not sure, mixed toughts. Maybe as part of main/? I am not
sure I like to habe two other extensions for that, they are handy tho'
:)

-- 
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org