Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76656 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63948 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2014 14:21:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Aug 2014 14:21:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.173 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.173 mail-vc0-f173.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.173] ([209.85.220.173:41799] helo=mail-vc0-f173.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 37/71-54989-30C02F35 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:21:56 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hy10so5762562vcb.4 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:21:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZabLA++t03mvuGAOIqhg1MlvjLnU0wtaZeN88pWEVgg=; b=aEur+1QKRLGRLodlvvXOTdTwZst5ZRgwLVMTREZoWS7yjBzrrlMkYVyp0FU7br6+Sf pj47PQtC/2+T9lq4voHYexBQNtTQjJBpbeOzOJPrOXVZpBUfmBI+QMh+IfiGXAT0ILKk bysRO/9Do3bcbynOeHXbXLgOwM/2/vcfy0qP4nCh/f2InBwC+LgrnFbC3Uiu+gkHpX5r zvaN6gzOcUM4/cWyb8vCOWnlQKL6+pYa5quiQMW1oorSseNoD77cYwQ3Pn5MF8LTSh3l 0VIWLeipCvulb3Wi6CQMVf8j6RHs5+N2MLFeY2/7+N7mAtW+nk9NOptcqpmhzR4IcLTL 3bxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7gmGRaOIis0bPh08F7bENhSalyboXnfrIC4Og9Ra4xYccUKXtYzZF3a9Rlut6S8FsfnGEDgCpmgw0Q+D3DLr3UrECTNC4h9q/yZzzUlkYvM2WhnIBUh8Oq7fIdZEejj0YNjt4 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.59.138 with SMTP id l10mr336194vch.59.1408371712521; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.110.170 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:21:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 18:21:52 +0400 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Levi Morrison , Joe Watkins , ircmaxell@php.net, Nikita Popov , Xinchen Hui , PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c25182a3104f0500e8170a Subject: Re: Optional Type Hinting From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov) --001a11c25182a3104f0500e8170a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I see your point. For me they just don't have a lot of sense without each other. Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2014, at 15:11, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > > What do you think about merging the following proposals into a single > and consistent one: > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/scalar_type_hinting_with_cast > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/returntypehinting > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/nullable_typehints > > No, please let=E2=80=99s not merge them. First off, the scalar hints prop= osal is > basically dead, I=E2=80=99ll have a replacement at some point, but I have= actually > abandoned it. > > Secondly, merging these together might be the death of all the RFCs. Whil= e > one might be uncontroversial on its own, bundling it together with other > changes might make it unpassable. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > > --001a11c25182a3104f0500e8170a--