Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76623
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: morrison.levi@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <53F1372B.9080207@sugarcrm.com>
References: <235C617B-25E1-4185-A784-38EF1D7BFFDC@ajf.me>
	<CAFMT4NpziftUPjPQY9n9Qv5uA6-qV4_EkdTOk8=ZnK5JO19zoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<38FC0B11-5E15-43E9-8467-347359970D46@ajf.me>
	<53F1372B.9080207@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2014 17:40:24 -0600
Message-ID: <CAFMT4Npbq_tvanY3qmZrp4FxPotD7c_M9ixJ1k_teL2ey3=yow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Closure::call()
From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison)

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> It does, but maybe you missed it. Under the Proposal section:
>>
>>> To solve this, we relax the current invariant of scoped closures
>>> having to be bound, and add a new parameter to bind(To) to produce
>>> an unbound, scoped closure, like so:
>
> Indeed, I missed it - I was looking for bindTo. I think it should be
> made more prominent, and I'm not sure what closure that is not static,
> but does not have a bound object, means. What happens if you call it? It
> sounds a bit strange concept - why would you need a closure that is not
> static, but is not bound to any object?

Hence the vote was cancelled while it is reworked.