Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76569 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93704 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2014 20:09:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Aug 2014 20:09:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cmbecker69@gmx.de; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cmbecker69@gmx.de; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmx.de designates 212.227.15.18 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cmbecker69@gmx.de X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.227.15.18 mout.gmx.net Received: from [212.227.15.18] ([212.227.15.18:56090] helo=mout.gmx.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EC/00-27128-6196EE35 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 16:09:59 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.101] ([91.67.244.80]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1VlJ-1WPino113J-00tRgT; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:09:53 +0200 Message-ID: <53EE6912.3040802@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:09:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikita Popov , Christoph Becker CC: Andrey Andreev , PHP internals , Andrea Faulds , "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" References: <3F1B2834-3939-4F86-86E0-207D2CE469D6@ajf.me> <53EE2E20.5060707@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QDRAHnKri3M4c1POoogtgc93dGJebimTSnZ7HgRfs6kybw65wm3 Hh/5Bs/GzFOBEHI9R58jD4acTrn86wDNe/P4NNqpZbdrYo6ajP6JlYu8v2nDClyMNZRz8/M ngLG+/v1vqeC59wrW43avruEuB+s0Oo3mVXRTWkSUGb1vI8xBeluh5gR9im+aaxMjgnUMCz oo9yh0fHzhaTHZhltPlpA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Introduce Abstract Syntax Tree From: cmbecker69@gmx.de (Christoph Becker) Nikita Popov wrote: > Yes, anything containing simple variables (like $i) will often deviate from > the usual evaluation order due to the CV optimization. I don't touch that. > What I've changed now is that ${a()}[b()] = c() will continue to call a, b, > c, rather than calling c, b, a (which was what the AST implementation > initially did). I honestly don't think that it matters, but I figured that > it's best to stick with the more "logical" behavior as long as it's not too > much trouble :) Thanks for the explanation. :) Anyway, I try to avoid relying on any particular evaluation order between sequence points. -- Christoph M. Becker