Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76454
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.53 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVrM6=TPVXbfSnV+jP=Lmiie83-fx6JdJcxENhLWbiZa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESVnVqd6m5-Dmhff0OiSFZxRNVBX8AvCQQmVYnDt7+gOJ-xug@mail.gmail.com>
	<BEDB9A15-DBC6-4C7F-BEA2-31779534EFA1@ajf.me>
	<CAESVnVrM6=TPVXbfSnV+jP=Lmiie83-fx6JdJcxENhLWbiZa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 22:42:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKxcST_aBAQWXC=ZttTkwud+zKo4vLL-kwptt3WYHigp=ihgEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113532b6b5ee7a0500758a34
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Mutliple defaults in switch statements
From: dragoonis@gmail.com (Paul Dragoonis)

--001a113532b6b5ee7a0500758a34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 12 Aug 2014 22:36, "Sara Golemon" <pollita@php.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> > On 12 Aug 2014, at 17:53, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:
> >> Voting is open: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/switch.default.multiple#vote
> >
> > I=E2=80=99m all for this, but the *minimum* discussion period is *two* =
weeks.
> >
> The two-week period is advisory and we don't need to get hung up on
> process for the sake of process.  There's been no meaningful
> discussion in the past week because nobody thinks this is remotely a
> bad idea.  Hell, some have questioned why this was put into an RFC in
> the first place. (It's arguably a bug, since the existing behavior
> could never have been described as right or intentional).

I fully back this. It's literally a bug fix which has let slide for some
time now. It's clear from the voting results that the core community
support this.

Thanks Sara for supplying the patch.

>
> If you're so worried about violating RFC process, I can revoke it
> entirely and just commit it without voting, and I'd be completely in
> the right.  Or, we can apply a reasonable amount of process without
> getting hung up on seven days worth of... no discussion whatsoever.
>
> -Sara
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>

--001a113532b6b5ee7a0500758a34--