Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76389 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63057 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2014 13:11:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Aug 2014 13:11:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.169 mail-vc0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.169] ([209.85.220.169:44130] helo=mail-vc0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/B8-13038-96922E35 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:11:05 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id le20so3953340vcb.28 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:11:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=aHGaj8IC6K49E7WX8EL1NOWtiBbv9zVGRJO/teHy79s=; b=agCfEfUY1sb9cXEuvoxXbaWBYW5Z/4csiw6Fg3OudxLr1DHb1Wll9xy4ENlrOs6ut2 RU77vqefpuyl5GNVViy/hS5FXttw2VMYgt3keyt1ZBVxB5eVUQ7gnTCht1ZYvkyDl93k YRekbp1N6ZqU4ij9uAoqY36EJEGo8ns+fpuMb3ajbZ3gCb5vURCZS+PMedjDFNSEwL9s OTSqnZxDKRTR0bQ3G8mPtgpCnKo6gNwpoN1O/il2robceoPfnYEwyr/kv+Kfh0sn09rP Ktp67ZJjUuQ+XUEL4o4SfrCYyvo+SnAZVl5t4bWc6+2mw8ezIEdwYXfP1QjPAslilP3C NIgA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnDjQWX3PZwX5vrbg3VjSthZPFCQUWUi5El9+DWtmUGP/GgvUyMOPX4d9nWXf5eZjC09dKoxpU2n7utFHFbm9yR2024pqJJFIA7yQ/uZY3VjrOIqw8n8QuEg4KkzQCm3NwidI9J X-Received: by 10.52.34.209 with SMTP id b17mr8367139vdj.49.1407330693299; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 06:11:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <5a5c7d37c2115f52a58d82d489540a6d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQGbyuheUrfNqTo1UF1zr6R+DTERegG59BEHnB2IDHA= Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:11:32 +0300 Message-ID: <79d5d0a1410487d543d37ba573b392a9@mail.gmail.com> To: Dan Ackroyd Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) Dan, Votes area almost never pre-announced. I have no problem with changing this habit, but I do have an issue with changing it retroactively for a particular vote. Regarding your points, there's a mandatory discussion period during which you should have brought these comments, instead of now. As a matter of fact, discussion about PHPNG died out more than a week ago, to the level that Dmitry even suggested we avoid wasting time and vote sooner (but that goes against the rules so we didn't do that). If you think the RFC is incomplete in its details and that you can't vote over it then you can of course withhold your vote or vote no. To your specific feedback, there's a migration document to extensions linked from the RFC, and shared here on internals about 10 days ago: https://wiki.php.net/phpng-upgrading I added another link to it from the 'RFC impact' section, as perhaps that's what prevented you from seeing it. I believe it's impractical to keep shared codebases for extensions between PHP 5.x and PHPNG. Dmitry - please correct me if I'm wrong... Zeev > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Ackroyd [mailto:danack@basereality.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2014 4:01 PM > To: Zeev Suraski > Cc: PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Move the phpng branch to master > > Hi, > > It would be good if people announced that they were going to open things > to > vote with a warning, rather than just throwing the voting open. > > The RFC is nowhere complete in it's details for people to make rational > decisions. e.g. the section on 'RFC impact' has this for the impact on > extensions. > > "Existing extensions will have to be updated to reflect the new data > structures > and updated APIs. Much of this work is already done for most of the > extensions bundled with PHP, but there are still extensions that need to > be > ported, and most of the extensions in PECL will have to be ported." > > That doesn't provide anything close to actual information about what needs > to > be done to port the extensions. There is no information about how > extensions > can support current PHP and PHPNG at the same time....which they will need > to do for the next couple of years at least. > > > cheers > Dan > > > On 6 August 2014 13:36, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > I opened the voting on the phpng RFC: > > > > > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/phpng#vote > > > > > > > > Voting ends on Thursday, August 14th. > > > > > > > > Please vote! > > > > > > > > Zeev