Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76371
Return-Path: <julienpauli@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 21899 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2014 08:59:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Aug 2014 08:59:52 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=julienpauli@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=julienpauli@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: julienpauli@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.176 mail-vc0-f176.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.176] ([209.85.220.176:49932] helo=mail-vc0-f176.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id AC/D0-13038-58EE1E35 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 04:59:50 -0400
Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id id10so3399277vcb.7
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=huSYjnesNAqCfpe8gusMxD6fAh3TPK+BuMXfMWlfvWw=;
        b=CLG4VTQ9fwb40x+n/Fp1BdkkOPYaP9+oZV7EJANzkjG7LkcwC22qSzi/4Prk8zYgRi
         0xKB0qAvpxubcqGj2QSYy56wI6dRTN9YAYtyxBvZcpg82z58BjV8P+naOlg4diVum073
         dvL7WPqodBS+fpNMIj06cAu757RZrOg6kuV88BFwwju0KbjNGReKJ2PK9zbnRGsnPepY
         TiAOCtR6Q+aOIFXqofoaxy3yGohPgt2HwIX6WU+kmCM5WouHhLaMooHbj+kT1Pzccbia
         plQZ584vobmWVmb16Y/YA18zQaKTqrevWsLpL4/VOGGBnG068bwgpxInx85rl9v4QVyS
         hsxg==
X-Received: by 10.52.98.201 with SMTP id ek9mr7800166vdb.35.1407315617475;
 Wed, 06 Aug 2014 02:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: julienpauli@gmail.com
Received: by 10.220.30.70 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Aug 2014 01:59:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9eiLsOcLrhECHEnA7HenB=Q3vQZ=xG7mM5-hq01wVCUegd=w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAESVnVr0J5qyAc-L0Yt_3Ahab5LVgtUErgoKsSPvgwe=QzppTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <53E1BDA6.5080506@php.net> <CA+9eiLsOcLrhECHEnA7HenB=Q3vQZ=xG7mM5-hq01wVCUegd=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 10:59:37 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TAvkSJSjIKBvAUG1SApIx8g1bng
Message-ID: <CAMUwpuSk_cg0BM3U8dc6ZFz8Z9Tyyt691ZpKqGqakNXN2EUOwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ca2c277823404fff23335
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Disallow multiple default blocks in a single
 switch statement
From: jpauli@php.net (Julien Pauli)

--20cf307ca2c277823404fff23335
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> wrote:

> yet another stupid implementation driven behavior :)
>
> +1 for master.
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>

Yep, definitely yes +1.

Julien.Pauli

--20cf307ca2c277823404fff23335--