Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76357 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5403 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2014 15:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Aug 2014 15:50:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:60355] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 62/E4-48163-F2DF0E35 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2014 11:50:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60EE8800CB; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:50:32 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SEi2x2VUaazB; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:50:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (05439dda.skybroadband.com [5.67.157.218]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8CCF18800E6; Tue, 5 Aug 2014 11:50:30 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: <53E0F651.1020101@ralphschindler.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 16:50:27 +0100 Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <53E0F651.1020101@ralphschindler.com> To: Ralph Schindler X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Closure::call and Function Referencing as Closures From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 5 Aug 2014, at 16:20, Ralph Schindler = wrote: > "->call()" would facilitate the following syntax, which I'd argue has = greater semantic meaning than the call_user_func() variant: >=20 > $f->bar->call()->call(); At the risk of stating the obvious, can=92t you just use = $f->bar->__invoke()? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/