Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76245 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76143 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2014 05:49:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jul 2014 05:49:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:55913] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DA/25-41808-9F537D35 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 01:49:47 -0400 Received: (qmail 22926 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2014 05:49:56 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 22920, pid: 22923, t: 0.0644s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 29 Jul 2014 05:49:55 -0000 Message-ID: <53D73603.1060800@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 06:49:55 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Thoughts on C version supported for PHP-Next From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 25/07/14 17:37, Julien Pauli wrote: > We nowadays support C89 officially . It is very stable and well implemented > in almost every compiler nowadays, but it is old and lack some features we > could benefit from. Isn't it interesting that on one hand we have a continual complaint that PHP is getting too old and has to evolve with the time, yet the primary development language is 25+ years old and the suggestion to move it on 10 years raises objections. On one hand if it's not broken ... on the other software must be changed every year ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk