Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76232 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83110 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2014 13:11:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Jul 2014 13:11:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.51 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.51 mail-qg0-f51.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.51] ([209.85.192.51:53458] helo=mail-qg0-f51.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2D/EB-26001-8EB46D35 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 09:11:05 -0400 Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id a108so8155927qge.38 for ; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=cHPCJE7oVpK9tR9hdIR0lW7ahXhvidIYvgOHLqWsniE=; b=ByfYvEBQOORLFeLZXHvoQJ/V98RQchW1Fim+wLM74m4nTy2vMWPRtm3zXW76Y2mscO cVX2wx01/fjCe1it8RgNT4ZlUC//cofTYAmUSBhYNxBY/FSAywKfZl0DLw4FoP9WKdcW CTiev1YNyv6bpDRaSkBr6qYvSpTaNZj01vHeuiNdFxjWSAHwAxUh5uFNfjsCdpuiIHXE SuJuIZOI6XAq57aKrm6i1n/bOdTg+KRrwEU2M8jsyMrgieyJT6kORt/Dy3h8IpgE9YLx lh11X/gM7/g5D+lXZLqS4hGde8h/u0CnOSropf/IeXB4b92YXO10cjP9nVd2doscuLF0 exaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.108.68 with SMTP id i62mr7271403qgf.56.1406553074200; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.24.54 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.24.54 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 06:11:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <103A6BB0-FFDB-4989-848F-258567EBD283@ajf.me> References: <482DEC36-8A5A-4840-910A-3C63CA3A503B@lonnylot.com> <103A6BB0-FFDB-4989-848F-258567EBD283@ajf.me> Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: To: Andrea Faulds Cc: Lonny Kapelushnik , Derick Rethans , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ad78658774d04ff40a833 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] imagettf* deprecation/removal From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) --001a113ad78658774d04ff40a833 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jul 28, 2014 1:23 PM, "Andrea Faulds" wrote: > > > On 28 Jul 2014, at 12:20, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > "Though this is a small change I believe it will bring significant valu= e > > to the PHP community. " > > > > The only value removing functions brings is broken code. There are no > > functional issues with the existing functions. Leave them alone. > > That sums up my thoughts on this as well. There=E2=80=99s nothing much wr= ong with the imagettf functions. If the needless duplication really bothers people, just make them FALIASes. There are many areas I like to do such things, but these two functions were definitely not on my list as they do not hurt nor create extra work. I won't battle to keep them but this kind of change is the typical debatable bc break. --001a113ad78658774d04ff40a833--