Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76140
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.220.172 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: julienpauli@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <127C762D-40B8-45BC-96CD-F470031ACFCD@golemon.com>
References: <CAMUwpuRJVmWwAMMdzAeoec=tvgkW1L++jxhDKjKbWvQNh5C7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <127C762D-40B8-45BC-96CD-F470031ACFCD@golemon.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 22:07:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMUwpuR-1aOgAns4cN5X2rY3_PZDuSh6UVuHeAJ+bwn5csVaEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <php@golemon.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0122a71e636e6904ff0a22cb
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Thoughts on C version supported for PHP-Next
From: jpauli@php.net (Julien Pauli)

--089e0122a71e636e6904ff0a22cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Sara Golemon <php@golemon.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 25, 2014, at 9:37, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote:
> >
> > Why not take PHP-Next step to support a more recent version ?
> > Even C99 would be allright and C11 would be super cool (though pretty
> > recent).
> >
> I'd stop with C99 for now.  One of PHP's strengths is that it builds
> /anywhere/.  I'd hate to lose that over a few pieces of syntactic sugar. (I
> say this as someone who's come to adore C++11)
>

Makes sense, even if I haven't met myself that many different platforms and
compilers fancies.

Julien.P

--089e0122a71e636e6904ff0a22cb--