Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:76130
Return-Path: <php@golemon.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 17810 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2014 17:27:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 25 Jul 2014 17:27:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.220.51 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.51 mail-pa0-f51.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.220.51] ([209.85.220.51:60532] helo=mail-pa0-f51.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 60/17-08559-69392D35 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 13:27:50 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id ey11so6477879pad.10
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
         :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
         :to;
        bh=0r/0V8JSf8xLuaY5IEZOLBYX6s/liu5Gwu+1GfNoLcc=;
        b=gId+mpnCNW9ErU3x8POIoZO0vOY0DlyZTuZlqWjS7xmFNQ7OFbT1tdgOHF3zSM3aHg
         MrI5bgskispdB/fp1ZeNXn9zTuvv+OWoqHv45puluxnxo665TrI9ZIVFUOc70k/cxobb
         WAWiC/whFP7IJDJPE3wsZvQ1rNmfXpyV1wCnQcLzcE/lL5+rhv8BW5FhJEWI+HbkG7o1
         tVcl6XjaVOGox5UZG8BOvqm6BV+eZq+S1xIKAIOtMi9UOPbwB7NMw+8KfmxwZNvZki22
         6xdz9rrFybaYuQN9MlSxKnNiMXK4LR0D3f5C+eyusPZyrRDZeUoqq6hFZLw5RQcje22t
         WGFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7Tl+j9OYtpB+4pxdGrt/ycyuAF/kc2arw3OFEutsFmnasjW/DxC+mDUB3uCi7P2EZAABY
X-Received: by 10.68.237.67 with SMTP id va3mr20352910pbc.19.1406309273409;
        Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.122.199.63] (mobile-166-147-080-014.mycingular.net. [166.147.80.14])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm9420958pbw.87.2014.07.25.10.27.52
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201)
In-Reply-To: <CAMUwpuRJVmWwAMMdzAeoec=tvgkW1L++jxhDKjKbWvQNh5C7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:27:52 -0700
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <127C762D-40B8-45BC-96CD-F470031ACFCD@golemon.com>
References: <CAMUwpuRJVmWwAMMdzAeoec=tvgkW1L++jxhDKjKbWvQNh5C7JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Thoughts on C version supported for PHP-Next
From: php@golemon.com (Sara Golemon)


> On Jul 25, 2014, at 9:37, Julien Pauli <jpauli@php.net> wrote:
>=20
> Why not take PHP-Next step to support a more recent version ?
> Even C99 would be allright and C11 would be super cool (though pretty
> recent).
>=20
I'd stop with C99 for now.  One of PHP's strengths is that it builds /anywhe=
re/.  I'd hate to lose that over a few pieces of syntactic sugar. (I say thi=
s as someone who's come to adore C++11)

-Sara=