Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75982 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 11680 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2014 21:48:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2014 21:48:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=andi@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=andi@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.48 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: andi@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.48 mail-pa0-f48.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.48] ([209.85.220.48:38980] helo=mail-pa0-f48.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4E/54-23414-89D20D35 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:48:10 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id et14so2514293pad.35 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:48:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=eBWDkwg/KkcRt8Qg1rWuTZYvftjZk7gyzV1VXVH5foA=; b=K7wqRu0ApouGapDq0UO8BXd7eW3KOQSNpkaCpq3CJe5Vurf3MBakN5vepmCUchujya zqdcInjJKpfhtne635qqkqk9txAYklJPAuV7Nmla90Xi6STgBcs/0UrdgUJCpKLrjn6c 2pQZ0eLF3guqTvFKI9nzpTP/HfttDg+mcjZ5xMkuHFirOpw8DGQfszMtuocd035ttbvW toEtow9ta2HnDvNGf+I35gYgFMEb/lRKSi+FcBx4K/7DWAgRposq+AA7VbECp109fiLg rJR2PeL6RU2bTUrmwcWLHlXfMj26YEbPp/16wCRKoNRjroySQ1e3bRMgzXe+EtndkE1Q c0Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnyS+cdVYxg5xJFVMJ5YlZ1pNbCso0DQCF17KhSxvvrOwyiQ/NKdF4Hh7c/veEifk8xPoQYdNGvcFaH78kdfdo2Ln312ijjI9VVCW/wurVIS8P5ChLlN2eenec0iXB3rE72Vd1n X-Received: by 10.70.127.163 with SMTP id nh3mr5330861pdb.139.1406152088549; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.6.199.240] (mobile-166-137-178-235.mycingular.net. [166.137.178.235]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xk1sm12908642pac.21.2014.07.23.14.48.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:48:07 -0700 (PDT) References: <6E316045-FD2D-49CD-8086-2C7DD59824FE@ajf.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <01D3EFE7-0481-4585-940A-A7D62BDF9FBE@zend.com> Cc: Ferenc Kovacs , Andrea Faulds , PHP internals X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D201) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:47:47 -0700 To: Kris Craig Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP (again) From: andi@zend.com (Andi Gutmans) > On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Kris Craig wrote: >=20 >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >>=20 >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the >> votes >>> to >>>> come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a >>>> minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is >>> brought >>>> up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the code= >>>> impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), >> but >>> it >>>> is an important decision for the project and for the language. >>>> sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic >>>=20 >>> That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don=E2=80=99t think we= need 2 >>> weeks for a vote. In a week=E2=80=99s time when the vote would end, if i= t looks >>> like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended. >>=20 >>=20 >> argh, you I right, the relevant part is "The voting has minimal period of= 1 >> week, which can be extended when circumstances warrant it.", so one week i= s >> fine by the rules. >>=20 >> -- >> Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs >> @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu >=20 > Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to > avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version > increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote. Let's keep this clean and not start a 100 email thread restating what both v= iew points have already said many times or do an artificial rally.=20 >=20 > Editorial aside, I'm glad that the two sides were able to come together an= d > get this to a vote finally. >=20 > --Kris