Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75979 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6238 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2014 21:18:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2014 21:18:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:41894] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 19/33-23414-B8620D35 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 17:18:04 -0400 Received: (qmail 9172 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jul 2014 21:18:03 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 9163, pid: 9169, t: 0.0645s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 23 Jul 2014 21:18:03 -0000 Message-ID: <53D0268B.9090601@lsces.co.uk> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:18:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <6E316045-FD2D-49CD-8086-2C7DD59824FE@ajf.me> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP (again) From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 23/07/14 19:23, Kris Craig wrote: > Wow, looks like the PHP 7 votes are dominating so far. If you want to > avoid the confusion and ridicule that will result from skipping a version > increment, I suggest you remember to cast your vote. Since PHP6 existed then sorry but using it again is just as confusing ;) There will be ridicule either way, so that is no reason for reusing a version number again. We just tag PHP6 exactly as it is documented - closed in 2010 - a fact that seems to have been dropped again from the arguments in the RFC :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk