Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75963 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52052 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2014 14:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2014 14:32:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:50938] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 92/00-51641-477CFC35 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:32:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985CB0007B; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:32:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id fIM0WvPnC05n; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:32:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (unknown [90.210.122.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 53879B0008B; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 10:32:18 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:32:15 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <6E316045-FD2D-49CD-8086-2C7DD59824FE@ajf.me> References: To: Ferenc Kovacs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP (again) From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 23 Jul 2014, at 15:21, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > I also think that it would be reasonable to have two weeks for the = votes to > come in, as https://wiki.php.net/rfc/voting states that "There'd be a > minimum of 2 weeks between when an RFC that touches the language is = brought > up on this list and when it's voted on is required." and while the = code > impact for this rfc is really small (modifying the version numbers), = but it > is an important decision for the project and for the language. > sorry if it feels being too bureaucratic That refers to the minimum time for discussion, I don=92t think we need = 2 weeks for a vote. In a week=92s time when the vote would end, if it = looks like not enough people have voted, I suppose it could be extended. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/