Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75946 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 17379 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2014 10:44:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2014 10:44:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sebastian@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sebastian@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 93.190.64.237 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sebastian@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 93.190.64.237 mail-1.de-punkt.de Received: from [93.190.64.237] ([93.190.64.237:33841] helo=mail-1.de-punkt.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/B7-21666-A129FC35 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 06:44:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail-1.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E643A3A0 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:44:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail-1.de-punkt.de Received: from mail-1.de-punkt.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-1.de-punkt.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07pAGjYf8cfV for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:44:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (sliph.netpirates.net [188.94.27.9]) (Authenticated sender: php@sebastian-bergmann.de) by mail-1.de-punkt.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1CF9D3A3B4 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:44:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53CF9217.3010009@php.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 12:44:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <53CEE7A8.6030607@garfieldtech.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP Language Specification From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann) On 07/23/2014 12:48 AM, Sara Golemon wrote: > I dunno, with syntax changes being 2/3rd majority and our formal RFC > process in place, I think we (PHP) can reasonably learn to make > updating the spec a formal part of our process. Requiring an RFC that changes syntax (or core semantics) to provide a patch for the specification in addition to the tests should suffice, no?