Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75869 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23295 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2014 14:57:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2014 14:57:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=phoenix@jonstirling.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=phoenix@jonstirling.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain jonstirling.co.uk from 209.85.215.46 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: phoenix@jonstirling.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.46 mail-la0-f46.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.46] ([209.85.215.46:63868] helo=mail-la0-f46.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 63/F7-21666-5CB7EC35 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:57:10 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b8so6046671lan.5 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=h7T8/R+SqCjXfJRNwsXwAQNr/iknA6D9WzfosU16fcA=; b=MqCLRiHRE44Qz/mXSzqQRjufXUi3e57v7iLdvLA8n985Tp5C/+j2/8IpCuMkJWMKMG WqWwDbhCWBBZhahjLcPVS57ym9pWuDty7lVae1VTNcBoZXZBeC20YxQPzEFC8ApPnva9 KVINiOD+DUdv3rZNMVoczZwczPfAp2rY5pXyKGfALivDtUp274KdYvdhFOlbpvRLHZHY mFnsJCs+0r+oXi/wp6ulOLgH6HwrZAlIy1Cbpdvt9fT7DEXzFc/bwRCtSYy5ZUo986JL egjgzKeK19Hi7/7MLwHWoPHM6Zdj9HQ+FjiqNi+/Rx9mbTxoq+hCjjZ0MmphRWvg+X3H NZfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmaa4c0FZnh/cH5LZoBQpPx9WX3/GBquQ+/0NOXwJONupfm4S2rxzVi6u8K1FHRXJdsxN/k MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.166.139 with SMTP id zg11mr33222220lbb.62.1406041026502; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.132.227 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:57:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [62.252.0.138] In-Reply-To: <76fe76cab9ff261f8ef8950f79fb6740@mail.gmail.com> References: <84603C6F-F984-4F73-892A-4416391E4769@ajf.me> <53CE66D4.2060103@gmail.com> <76fe76cab9ff261f8ef8950f79fb6740@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 15:57:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Andrea Faulds , Rowan Collins , "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113395bcecba8004fec96fd7 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP From: phoenix@jonstirling.co.uk (Jonny Stirling) --001a113395bcecba8004fec96fd7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Maybe then an option should be added to vote "not now" or similar. You're forcing people into a decision for this or that when some may not wish for the decision to be made right now, and without the ability to abstain from either option. Neither of you are going to change your minds anyway, and since it's your choice, all I can do is make the points now in hopes that they'll make sense down the line. The reason for the provided post being 5.7 is because it wasn't changed when it really should have been and somebody took it to be literally without enough research. Fix the cause, not the effect, update the version file to be show that it's the ng dev branch. P.s. no complaining when the bike-shedding on this topic returns in a few years ;) Jonny. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Zeev Suraski wrote: > > From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:ajf@ajf.me] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 4:56 PM > > To: Rowan Collins > > Cc: internals@lists.php.net > > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP > > > > Maybe if I have some time I'll try to restructure the RFC. > > Please don't. > > I think the way it's laid out right now makes sense. Let's not try to > sweep this under the carpet - we two mutually exclusive options and we > need to decide between them. > > We agreed on a certain format, we agreed that each option will have its > own section and that its proponents will write the best possible case for > it - rebuttal or otherwise. Let's stick with this decision and move > forward. > > To those who are saying 'let's bury it for now', I absolutely think we > should go all the way and be done with it. In fact, had Andrea not bring > it up a few weeks ago, I'd be bringing it up shortly after the PHPNG RFC. > This has been a lingering question for a long time, and personally, I'm > fed up with having to write 'PHP.NEXT', '.1', '.2', '6/7' and all sorts of > other politically-correct version numbers. I think those who write 'PHP > 6' or alternatively 'PHP 7' are being unfair until a decision has been > taken. > > We've invested heavily in this in terms of discussion, we're not waiting > for any additional data points and delaying the decision will do nothing > but waste additional time in the future. > > Let's take a decision and be done with it. > > Zeev > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --001a113395bcecba8004fec96fd7--