Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75838
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.216.41 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <aa6e605aa20062ea943b550d342ae222@mail.gmail.com>
References: <b39ebab3d19d76cda9bafa25919c0e67@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGa2bXahqscNFe5Dy7Lc6NcjZDfw+tkNBtM8Z8p-+n7anq8gew@mail.gmail.com>
	<df087915cfde8c749fd9551953a3ca40@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH-PCH7jd6D=sP6MaAD4tK-F0SRXpWj3_bzie9y5ZqeL-Gi3cA@mail.gmail.com>
	<aa6e605aa20062ea943b550d342ae222@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 14:17:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH54n4aDMriiq4d_V0XFTjgx4wtw3=9=-3swCyJ5LMcUGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2d7ec3c92d104fec73431
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Move phpng to master
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001a11c2d7ec3c92d104fec73431
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

>
>
> He just asks if we will have a 5.7 release while working on the next majo=
r
> in master.
>
> I don't think that we can release the php-next under a years, so I think
> that an 5.7 could be warranted (to keep up with our roadmap), but depends
> on wether or not we have enough new (BC-safe) features.
>
> I don=E2=80=99t see a reason of why we can=E2=80=99t have this major vers=
ion ready by or
> even sooner than the current yearly rhythm we have.  In fact, if we do ai=
m
> to work in parallel on both 5.7 and .NEXT =E2=80=93 we=E2=80=99re likely =
to needlessly
> delay .NEXT=E2=80=A6
>
>
>
> Zeev
>
>
>

Hi Zeev,

The discussion seems to be sidetracked by the topic on when should we
release PHP-NEXT and what else should it contains.
Could we agree to put that aside for now, and agree to discuss this later,
after we managed to have a consensus on merging phpng to master?
I think that it is an important question, but not having phpng in master
block the other features/changes as well, and we don't have to decide about
the roadmap/features for PHP-NEXT right now.
Thanks for your understanding!

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--001a11c2d7ec3c92d104fec73431--