Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75828 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50234 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2014 09:41:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2014 09:41:12 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:41513] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A2/BA-14611-7B13EC35 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2014 05:41:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 7449 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2014 09:41:08 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7442, pid: 7446, t: 0.0675s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 22 Jul 2014 09:41:08 -0000 Message-ID: <53CE31B4.1060107@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:41:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <-6299216022086038902@unknownmsgid> <53CE0EAE.8060602@lsces.co.uk> <0587d9fc9ab9ac41fcbfdb499c4e6ab8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Move phpng to master From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 22/07/14 10:32, Pierre Joye wrote: >> As i understood Nikita and laurence they are already improving it based on >> > the first prototype from month ago. Honestly, if Nikita says converting his >> > extensions improved the API a lot then this is a good sign for me already. > It does not improve anything from an extension developer point of > view, or very little. On the other APIs are more dangerous, confusing > and inconsistent. And unavailability of extensions is a blocker currently as well. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk