Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:7576 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95079 invoked by uid 1010); 4 Feb 2004 20:17:47 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94976 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2004 20:17:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO basiczlager.backendmedia.com) (195.75.116.242) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 20:17:47 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by basiczlager.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D2F83293; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:17:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from basiczlager.backendmedia.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (basiczlager [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30315-04; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:17:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by basiczlager.backendmedia.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 00EF58329A; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:17:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from backendmedia.com (port-212-202-37-73.reverse.qsc.de [212.202.37.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by basiczlager.backendmedia.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D59E83293; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:17:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <402152F1.4030000@backendmedia.com> Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 21:15:45 +0100 Organization: BackendMedia GbR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zeev@zend.com Cc: steph.fox@virgin.net, internals@lists.php.net References: <5.1.0.14.2.20040204201046.06eae688@localhost> <5.1.0.14.2.20040204221122.07af2dd8@localhost> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040204221122.07af2dd8@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RC1 From: smith@backendmedia.com (Lukas Smith) Zeev Suraski wrote: > At 22:12 04/02/2004, Steph wrote: > >> > (b) Default inclusion of the SOAP extension >> >> That word 'default' kinda muddies the issue - are you suggesting that >> SOAP >> is included in distributions, or are you suggesting that it should be >> enabled by default? > > > I think we should consider both. I think it would be awesome to have SOAP out of the box. However I do think this shouldn't be rushed (especially since we dont want to break BC). Furthermore its probably a good idea to have ext CS fixed before its enabled by default? regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07