Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75725 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81726 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2014 21:13:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2014 21:13:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:38942] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 54/55-48607-5E03CC35 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:13:11 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F49F1DAB60; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:13:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:13:06 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky.home.derickrethans.nl To: Andrea Faulds cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <84603C6F-F984-4F73-892A-4416391E4769@ajf.me> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1110397204-1405890786=:4247" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) --8323329-1110397204-1405890786=:4247 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: >=20 > On 20 Jul 2014, at 00:26, Andrea Faulds wrote: >=20 > > The poll is now open: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php6#vote > >=20 > > Voting shall end in a week=E2=80=99s time on 2014-07-27. >=20 > I=E2=80=99ve cancelled the vote because I don=E2=80=99t think the case fo= r 6 is=20 > sufficiently fleshed out. The RFC is now massively imbalanced in=20 > favour of 7, which isn=E2=80=99t really fair to the 6 side, and I don=E2= =80=99t think=20 > we can hold a vote while that=E2=80=99s still the case. >=20 > Unfortunately I=E2=80=99m not terribly good at making such a case, so hel= p in=20 > developing the 6 side would be appreciated. I won=E2=80=99t reopen the vo= te=20 > until the 6 side is sufficiently developed. Huh what? This is like you weren't happy with the way how the vote was=20 going so you cancelled it? What nonsense. cheers, Derick --8323329-1110397204-1405890786=:4247--