Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75718
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
In-Reply-To: <4B7045CD-7239-4F4E-82B9-A8E68F16ACA5@ajf.me>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:51:21 +0100
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <217B1BED-0DE2-4B67-A21B-B8E0864DBB34@ajf.me>
References: <84603C6F-F984-4F73-892A-4416391E4769@ajf.me> <CAPg3XxKKLRKn0N1_zpkDanCPwN5uGjwcR3nQ6bYnftqvuba7EQ@mail.gmail.com> <4B7045CD-7239-4F4E-82B9-A8E68F16ACA5@ajf.me>
To: Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP
From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds)


On 20 Jul 2014, at 16:43, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:

>=20
> On 20 Jul 2014, at 16:39, Peter Cowburn <petercowburn@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
>> It might be just me, but the whole RFC actually seems particularly
>> one-sided. The argument for PHP 6 is very short and reads half-baked. =
 The
>> overwhelming majority of this very short section of the RFC is spent
>> describing how naming the release =93PHP 6=94 will be a problem, with =
a very
>> wishy-washy conclusion that the author =93expects=94 and =93thinks=94 =
it won=92t end
>> up being a problem. The PHP 6 section makes no attempt to provide =
counter
>> points to things mentioned in the following section, nor really =
attempts to
>> make *any* strong point at all.
>=20
> I swear the PHP 6 section was much longer before. Did Zeev delete some =
of it?

Zeev must have as the only person who edited it since was him.

I=92ve restored the Rationale section from before to =93The Case for PHP =
6=94.

--
Andrea Faulds
http://ajf.me/