Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75708 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42500 invoked from network); 20 Jul 2014 13:01:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Jul 2014 13:01:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 217.147.176.214 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.147.176.214 mail4-2.serversure.net Linux 2.6 Received: from [217.147.176.214] ([217.147.176.214:36892] helo=mail4.serversure.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 96/31-36040-D9DBBC35 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 09:01:18 -0400 Received: (qmail 7258 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2014 13:01:15 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 7245, pid: 7255, t: 0.0612s scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.96/m:52 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.8?) (lester@rainbowdigitalmedia.org.uk@81.138.11.136) by mail4.serversure.net with ESMTPA; 20 Jul 2014 13:01:14 -0000 Message-ID: <53CBBD9A.8090102@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 14:01:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP internals References: <84603C6F-F984-4F73-892A-4416391E4769@ajf.me> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE][RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) On 20/07/14 07:08, Zeev Suraski wrote: > I took the time to rewrite the case for PHP 7. It's a complete rewrite > written by someone who actually believes that this is the right choice for > us to pick :) Is '6' really such an unlucky number? Wasn't Vista essentially Windows 6? ... I don't have a vote, but I do have sufficient 'PHP6' material in my local archive to understand why using that simply does not work. It would be interesting to see the voting choices based on the time the voter has been using PHP? Prior to 2010 there was sufficient activity on PHP6 for it to have reached a point where it had an existence even without a formal release. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk