Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75688 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91749 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2014 13:05:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Jul 2014 13:05:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.200 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.200 imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.200] ([192.64.116.200:54788] helo=imap1-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E3/B1-15959-2AB19C35 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:05:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28D6B00081; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:05:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id zxmONBe_Jh82; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:05:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (unknown [90.210.122.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13D8AB0007B; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:05:21 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:05:14 +0100 Cc: Kris Craig , Nikita Popov , Sara Golemon , bishop@php.net, PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <7646A8D1-69A2-4255-B048-D3B9F28B422F@ajf.me> <37F89E54-C5B9-4E81-9D1B-660190BDB1FF@ajf.me> To: Tjerk Meesters X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv() From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 18 Jul 2014, at 04:39, Tjerk Meesters = wrote: > This makes it more complicated because a language change requires 2/3 > majority while a new function requires 50% + 1. >=20 > To make things simpler - and I believe it had been proposed before - = the > main vote should include the implementation as a function and the = secondary > vote should be for the operator. That=92s the current proposal in the RFC. A 2/3 operator vote = simultaneous with a fallback 50%+1 function vote. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/