Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75644 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 26002 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2014 06:31:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jul 2014 06:31:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 209.85.220.176 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.220.176 mail-vc0-f176.google.com Received: from [209.85.220.176] ([209.85.220.176:48443] helo=mail-vc0-f176.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/43-09067-3CD67C35 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:31:32 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id ik5so3595721vcb.21 for ; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :thread-index:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=89VXXteQ5riPOVkbYfwQXxj+na/9IuOYEyFO92Lfq1k=; b=i+GaAi4ZMmIeHTTgN/ZjbEJfKjPI2kVfCZRd8lc0bfrffAfNtsYOnbNMFfC3wHo0YL nTVs4cJd4BeS3z+KIG+aRka/OcxEvfbEl26l1jZEYx1V/k+RfDBKqI3VpPIxvykOxTR5 oKzC2PTzFqfitTgCx4p/rhUhP0vripFh84MROcEdaie7xhUsaEm5KgfMsVYgK8dfH9Ej 2WCPr6Nca5q9bmejiuLk4wksSOfgxVd5A6fg0oZ4TW4ykCBIPqVdhbBEohm4GnfJJ2xp i0bIB4j2q186jW0UC//RcPj2D3bAzxLIx3yMSIzn32UWUh8HPh0Hmiek29iCbEyPQBsp en/g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnEKtEQDlu1GEwBT6kSLCqRr8mVzPbuFc60X2+h5lgYnbgnIfry5HWcWeCwKBumynopOg/HFVb5UMRHJG1fKlbTlgVNs31OAYiMvk0ZrJyR4rc8Vk2CDTsOTUhJVLDK3YhM8IW7 X-Received: by 10.220.167.2 with SMTP id o2mr36249371vcy.8.1405578689122; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 23:31:29 -0700 (PDT) References: <7646A8D1-69A2-4255-B048-D3B9F28B422F@ajf.me> <53C47CA2.4050306@sugarcrm.com> <714C2E5E-A321-4993-9CFB-F7DFAC45C532@ajf.me> <53C4B955.5060401@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQLLVmCxW2hUorZ722a/IWXk1TMisAI40xbBAjmot10C8Zr2nAHQBfRAAnBYC0cB6kwhnpk/7h1Q Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 09:31:28 +0300 Message-ID: <0358762deba3fc2a75a87d939aedae6b@mail.gmail.com> To: Kris Craig , Andrea Faulds Cc: Stas Malyshev , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv() From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) > -----Original Message----- > From: Kris Craig [mailto:kris.craig@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:02 AM > To: Andrea Faulds > Cc: Stas Malyshev; PHP internals > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv() > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote: > Perhaps the RFC could have two options for approval; one with %% and the > other with either %/ or /%. Thoughts? Yes, horrible ones :) I can't believe we're seriously considering adding an operator for something so uncommon. I'm actually in favor of adding APIs, but absolutely not an obscure operator. We're not Perl. Zeev