Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75641 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 21281 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2014 06:18:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Jul 2014 06:18:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:53119] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 40/42-09067-79A67C35 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:18:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E8F8800D2; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:17:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id N1s8d92lhBr0; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (unknown [90.210.122.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB76C8800E6; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 02:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 07:17:52 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <30840CFE-948D-43AD-A3C4-05729E565FF0@ajf.me> References: <7646A8D1-69A2-4255-B048-D3B9F28B422F@ajf.me> <37F89E54-C5B9-4E81-9D1B-660190BDB1FF@ajf.me> To: bishop@php.net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv() From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:11, Bishop Bettini wrote: > As another contender, how about: >=20 > $x =3D 242 %/ 7; > $x %/=3D 13; >=20 > The % reflects the relationship to modulus, while the / reflects the = division effect. I think %/ looks worse, but I think it seems more = apropos. >=20 I also quite like this one, and I=92d prefer %/ to /%. What are = internals's thoughts on this? Do you like %/ but not %%? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/