Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75569 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40569 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2014 22:32:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Jul 2014 22:32:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:56157] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 72/CA-15121-5FBA5C35 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:32:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE918800D2; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:32:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JRc536Qy_JSQ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:32:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.15] (unknown [90.210.122.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4079B8800E7; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 18:32:16 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:32:13 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <7646A8D1-69A2-4255-B048-D3B9F28B422F@ajf.me> To: Yasuo Ohgaki X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv() From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 15 Jul 2014, at 23:12, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: > If we are going to have integer arithmetics, it may be better to have = full set of operators/functions >=20 > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D30701 I=92d rather not go to that length, but if someone wants to do that, = they may. Bigints might help here=85 although they might also cause more problems = in places. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/