Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75313 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37149 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2014 14:39:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 Jul 2014 14:39:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.207 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.207 imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.207] ([192.64.116.207:55549] helo=imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/63-19233-121BAB35 for ; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:39:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB2A8C007B; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:39:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap2.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id C9KsPG0_GT12; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:39:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from andreas-air.home (host86-172-51-137.range86-172.btcentralplus.com [86.172.51.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 032C58C0075; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:39:24 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:39:20 +0100 Cc: PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <594DCAB3-D997-44ED-9A2E-D37B6DE66B32@ajf.me> References: To: Michael Wallner X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Concurrency support for run-tests From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 7 Jul 2014, at 15:36, Michael Wallner wrote: > Hm... didn't think of that, seems overly complex. What would actually = need the singularity of the universe? :) I don=92t think it=92d be difficult. It wouldn=92t mean you can=92t run = tests alongside it, just that you can=92t run it concurrently with = another test with the same no-concurrent directive. So, if you had, say, = a non-concurrent filesystem test, and another one, and some unrelated = tests, you=92d have to run those two FS tests sequentially, but you = could still run unrelated tests at the same time. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/