Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75305
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.192.51 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1581132639526056444@unknownmsgid>
References: <61EEC54E-7B8D-433E-A391-75F8D6A41E79@ajf.me>
	<650742796f119ed972a688a58e02242b@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEZPtU7WuRQToC6MVoqz7-O2TFL3Q6vgp4ZUD6dto0pkn-4bFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<53BA8E93.8060708@lsces.co.uk>
	<CAEZPtU4TPqZ5mt8r8BjC-kWq9-V79pFNRHLCWPzZXCp02QYPmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<D57C8F7C-CA26-4751-AC6C-B8369623D9B9@ajf.me>
	<1581132639526056444@unknownmsgid>
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:05:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU6UjVbBy-aARPDGroLvKw2gPjZDAhMGfAQi3jfiQ=Gw0w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@zend.com>
Cc: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>, 
	Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11370a3486f52304fd9a22d1
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--001a11370a3486f52304fd9a22d1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

And here we go. So basically you are saying that once phpng is stabilized,
no matter the api/SRC cleanness, we are good for next. This is very bad and
I will vote -1 on anything close to this idea.

Besides that, the same kind of estimation was done for opcache, which was a
much smaller beast. They went bad by 300%, just saying.
On Jul 7, 2014 2:57 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <zeev@zend.com> wrote:

> > On 7 =D7=91=D7=99=D7=95=D7=9C 2014, at 08:50, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me=
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The problem is that people who want to add stuff for PHP 6 feel they
> have to add it to phpng, because if phpng is to be PHP 6, then it would
> need to be based off that branch.
> >
>
> I don't think it's a problem, because I don't think we're two years
> away from releasing a phpng-based version and I don't think it's a
> moving target at this point.  So I agree we need to remove these
> uncertainties.
>
> I'm going to start an RFC-based discussion for moving phpng to master
> so that the uncertainties around it are removed.
>
> Zeev
>

--001a11370a3486f52304fd9a22d1--