Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75287 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 22794 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2014 17:07:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jul 2014 17:07:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ajf@ajf.me; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ajf@ajf.me; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain ajf.me designates 192.64.116.199 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ajf@ajf.me X-Host-Fingerprint: 192.64.116.199 imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from [192.64.116.199] ([192.64.116.199:46287] helo=imap11-2.ox.privateemail.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E4/90-18632-83289B35 for ; Sun, 06 Jul 2014 13:07:04 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39FC8800E4; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:07:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id a6U4LK9mZWey; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:07:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from andreas-air.home (host86-172-51-137.range86-172.btcentralplus.com [86.172.51.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84F198800D0; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 13:06:58 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\)) In-Reply-To: <53B97D60.7010503@lsces.co.uk> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 18:06:54 +0100 Cc: PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <61EEC54E-7B8D-433E-A391-75F8D6A41E79@ajf.me> <1E40C2BC-3C86-4D20-9C34-C8E0B6BFF925@ajf.me> <53B953A8.7070904@lsces.co.uk> <53B97D60.7010503@lsces.co.uk> To: Lester Caine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Name of Next Release of PHP From: ajf@ajf.me (Andrea Faulds) On 6 Jul 2014, at 17:46, Lester Caine wrote: > On 06/07/14 16:08, Andrea Faulds wrote: >> I think it=92s generally clear what=92s for the new PHP 6 and what=92s = for the old; anything from after the old PHP 6 was abandoned must be = about a new PHP 6, and anything from before it must be about the old PHP = 6. If this RFC were to pass with people voting for 6, then it would be = pretty clear that anything coming after it was about the new PHP 6. >=20 > https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=3Dphp6+site%3Abugs.php.net ... >=20 > Now one can filter additional on date, but the point here is that just > starting with the bugs list we have conflicting material that needs to > be avoided. PHP6 WAS documented extensively even just on the web site, = a > lot of that material gets mirrored with more recent timestamps which > makes filtering what is new and what is old a lot more difficult. Even > PHP7 appears quite often on the website, but fortunately not too often > in the bugs list =85 Can=92t we just rename the PHP 6 category to =93Old PHP 6=94 on = bugs.php.net and be done with it? Or does it not work like that? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/