Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75167
Return-Path: <linepogl@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 70220 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2014 16:05:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jul 2014 16:05:07 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=linepogl@gmail.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=linepogl@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.219.52 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: linepogl@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.219.52 mail-oa0-f52.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.219.52] ([209.85.219.52:35572] helo=mail-oa0-f52.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 3B/E4-47713-1BD24B35 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:05:06 -0400
Received: by mail-oa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id j17so12375987oag.39
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=EYahUXwqNBV6gD+bsPPfVJ3ucAgKzxNgaspmGOk9w+4=;
        b=IH+ZMdCD+eFu3KXXKU4HfXzbkt2HGyXSQApFazIIc5un/oE7b8+zzE4ByfqE+0BmzK
         mPM5ImDSzbJN0TtNYe0uXZIDBroDEz3F5tyWB5Vy2i6hsrEknNvNAyWHh+8/FK4NXA9a
         gAChS8FlyaVL0YO33RosfkRU19DGO/SL9eHszfQKPf4MQCPR/oh5qUintdnnKD/p1HCa
         fo9BRuWY6IVbA5hhnMrobQkwFOP/qeXvwYjzFqSThIy+9AOYJEiPJfu/bil53p0UGjPk
         hJ9QMI9n5iv42v/XTx7Ur1tYOPJ+EPSvMUZjI7NAXmMYrWhA12ChpjK11Oe2LwcHF8Mr
         clrQ==
X-Received: by 10.182.236.193 with SMTP id uw1mr58923804obc.12.1404317102850;
 Wed, 02 Jul 2014 09:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.20.48 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 09:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c_w68h7FNGS0U96Fn+wv-s7j3is_Bn=W+_W2LoMA776Gw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAF+90c-jyBCnHdYjssGV+Avsw2B=Zt8TpNUzuDsNDWabV43fQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_w68h7FNGS0U96Fn+wv-s7j3is_Bn=W+_W2LoMA776Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 18:04:42 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMyk_AbtMJyhwx87oTX7y-QS7nuihL6poNsfJ4EN7jViqT+s8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2e9301149bc04fd380e02
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] [PHP 6] Uniform Variable Syntax
From: linepogl@gmail.com (Lazare Inepologlou)

--001a11c2e9301149bc04fd380e02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

2014-07-02 17:51 GMT+02:00 Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>:

> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>
> > Hi internals!
> >
> > I have created a proposal for a more consistent and complete variable
> > syntax for PHP 6:
> >
> >     https://wiki.php.net/rfc/uniform_variable_syntax
> >
> > The RFC is targeted at PHP 6 because it breaks compatibility for some
> > rarely used variable-variable constructs.
> >
>
> Any more feedback on this? Otherwise I'll start the vote sometime soon :)
>
>
Yes, in the RFC, you mention that this will be possible:

($obj->closure)()

While this is very welcome, I was wandering if we could skip the extra
parenthesis, like this:

$obj->closure()

Likewise, this would also be nice:

new ClassName->foo()



Thanks,

Lazare INEPOLOGLOU
Ing=C3=A9nieur Logiciel

--001a11c2e9301149bc04fd380e02--