Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75133 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62756 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2014 23:52:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Jun 2014 23:52:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dz@heroku.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dz@heroku.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain heroku.com designates 209.85.192.169 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dz@heroku.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.192.169 mail-pd0-f169.google.com Received: from [209.85.192.169] ([209.85.192.169:61864] helo=mail-pd0-f169.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6A/63-46378-1A6A0B35 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:52:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id g10so7200062pdj.14 for ; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:51:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=+RbMCQa5++0KB7+zedL/UZ0IMYZMd+TT1bEnOco2OuE=; b=gUFDfr1/nVw0KS+jC/ODE/RwO2jpZcOtAqqYDZqMncYNg+EiuppJ6Nl0IRM/oLnNrO 6afvWuAoE6mn2tK+l+eW50XDwLiPuCgImXMNhNqJMIKVsIdrnvpNFaqL3J2INxso5n9d +iZu1SmNRQ0b1KNeCVzpUzbEBs1VWmJujkzOlHcbIHtY0INgZdnvjumDLjqpmxU00Dmw /pND/it7RzskzZ1wCUj+vXYCHJfa7Q94tGSUexUwl6qBE7O6xWdyWlgsEgu8lVq9lFjG s2CZsFunaHdc1yq/J0Ljf3nqxeM4anoSKIa6HWT1xEagZz64qMZg1iGfkO0v42e5OphH FuYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnObnhQrWFZ6q+tjoTV94rn2p13rXjbeMrmfDaBShLkUjIKLx9qIm9L26Dg1KPic8T6kBAa X-Received: by 10.67.23.227 with SMTP id id3mr46868525pad.45.1404085918900; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wombookair.local ([208.66.24.78]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id tr2sm90056902pab.26.2014.06.29.16.51.57 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:51:55 -0700 Cc: Pierre Joye , Julien Pauli , Stas Malyshev , Antony Dovgal , Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <6ED8D01A-F3B9-4149-AD6D-EC13368ADD6B@heroku.com> References: <035C7115-6871-4FC6-802E-464FD48070EF@heroku.com> <1C110716-6C9D-4EB8-97BA-2CEABE2C4847@heroku.com> <5A82BEA2-7D25-46B8-BFFF-6EB368B46190@heroku.com> <9A3A1383-B237-46FE-977B-A191A76C650A@heroku.com> <53AC5D29.3010707@sugarcrm.com> <8332CA5A-A255-4222-8C06-303813653CB4@heroku.com> To: Ferenc Kovacs X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Fixing (and making easier) Apache mod_proxy_fcgi with PHP-FPM From: dz@heroku.com (David Zuelke) Hi, Thanks for the merge, but the just-merged PR addresses a different issue = than bug 65641. That one is still unaddressed. The NEWS entry for the just-merged PR should be something like "Support = Apache 2.4.10+ SetHandler method for mod_proxy_fcgi and PHP-FPM", and = bug 65641 should be re-opened. I'll see if I can look at the patches for bug 65641 again the next few = days; my gut feeling is that there should be a much easier way of fixing = this. After all, the patches all strip out parts of a string that = shouldn't be there in the first place. David On 27.06.2014, at 15:27, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:51 PM, David Zuelke wrote: > On 27.06.2014, at 00:39, Pierre Joye wrote: >=20 > > On Jun 26, 2014 10:30 PM, "David Zuelke" wrote: > > > > > > On 26.06.2014, at 12:23, Pierre Joye wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 26, 2014 9:12 PM, "David Zuelke" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's what RCs are for, right? :) > > > > > > > > In an ideal world with ideal users yes. > > > > > > > > But we are not in that world :) > > > > > > I know :) > > > > > > > So what is wrong in putting us on the safe? Waiting 2 months max is = not that bad :) >=20 > Sure, but then it would be good to have this in the next 5.6 RC, = that'll probably get more testing exposure, too. >=20 > Either way, someone should please commit it into some branch soon ;) >=20 > David >=20 >=20 > Was waiting for Stas to reply, I will merge it into 5.6 this weekend = if he doesn't reply that he wants to merge it into 5.4, then we can test = it with the 5.6RCs and merge back to 5.4/5.5. >=20 > --=20 > Ferenc Kov=E1cs > @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu