Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:75130
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <53AFDE2C.2040104@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 11:36:44 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
CC: Sebastian Bergmann <sebastian@php.net>, 
 Rowan Collins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
References: <53AEC4F0.8040307@php.net>
In-Reply-To: <53AEC4F0.8040307@php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Revisiting Anonymous Classes
From: cryptocompress@googlemail.com (Crypto Compress)

Hi,

Am 28.06.2014 15:36, schrieb Sebastian Bergmann:
>   An anonymous class can extend one class or implement one interface.
>   Unlike non-anonymous classes, an anonymous class cannot do both.
>   In other words, it cannot both extend a class and implement an
>   interface, nor can it implement more than one interface.

Omitting name might be useful but please don't redefine the class concept.


Am 28.06.2014 20:53, schrieb Rowan Collins:
> is there any reason to think that this will pass now when it didn't then?

Don't know a reason but PHP6 is a good point in time for new syntax & 
features. +1


cryptocompress